Why it’s time to redefine how we measure event success

Events should focus on quality content and revenue, with new metrics such as audience quality and tailored content.

The industry is moving towards using data to match buyer and seller expectations and analysing attendee's one-to-one connections to provide insights into their interests and buying behaviours.
The industry is moving towards using data to match buyer and seller expectations and analysing attendee's one-to-one connections to provide insights into their interests and buying behaviours. Photo Credit: Adobe Stock/THANANIT

Over the past three years, the events landscape has undergone significant changes, with event professionals adapting to virtual and hybrid formats and redesigning in-person events to address attendees' post-pandemic needs and concerns.

Thus, it is logical that the measurement of event success should be reevaluated or even changed. Petrina Goh, regional commercial director at CWT Meetings & Events for SEA & Hong Kong, notes that there is now a greater emphasis on the quality of content to attract attendees amidst the strong rebound of in-person events.

“Audiences today are highly attuned to ‘meaningful meetings’ – they are more inclined to invest their time and money in a trade show that may have a higher ticket price but offers excellent networking opportunities and content tailored to their specific interests, rather than a generic event with a very broad audience,” she says. “For example, curating and ensuring the presence of industry experts and thought leaders at an event can help drive participation from attendees, exhibitors and sponsors.”

According to Beth Surmont, Vice President of Event Strategy and Design for Marketing, Strategy, and Experience at 360 Live Media, understanding an organisation's desired outcomes for its events is crucial to determine if they were worthwhile. In a recent PCMA article, Surmont suggests setting key performance indicators based on goals such as non-member participation, first-time attendees, and conversion rates to membership or program subscriptions for associations.

“Most organisations also have goals around revenue, and the new environment we find ourselves in requires us to consider other ways events generate short- and long-term revenue,” she says in the article. “For example, a trade show can measure the quality of the buying audience over quantity. If you know now that your attendance numbers for an upcoming event may not reach 2019 levels, you can take control of the story and attract more sponsors and exhibitors by communicating such details as registrants’ job titles, decision-making authority, and projected budgets.”

Goh suggests that organisers should avoid 'forced' appointment schedules that require attendees to achieve a certain number of meetings per day and generic content. Instead, organisers should use pre-show data, such as content interest surveys and industry trend reports, to match buyers with the appropriate exhibitors.

“Ensure the content that each speaker is presenting is tailored to what the target audience actually finds interesting and useful,” she says. “This naturally means that more work must be put into pre-show preparations, such as content surveys to understand the audience’s objectives and expectations, and to then better prepare exhibitors and speakers.”

Goh notes that the industry is shifting away from metrics focused on attendance and improvement, and towards using data to match buyer and seller expectations. For instance, analysing the type of one-to-one connections or meetings that attendees make during an event can provide insights into their interests, buying behaviours, and preferred topics or trends. Organisers can use this information to tailor conversations and boost interest in future events.